“People seem to be more motivated by the thought of losing something than by the thought of gaining something of equal value.”
Let’s get started.
For a detailed summary, you can click here.
When we see other people as being similar to ourselves, we tend to utilize their conduct to determine what is appropriate for us to do.
People who are attempting to determine a man’s character pay great attention to his activities.
Getting someone to desire to buy right away and without giving it any thought is the goal.
The response to the cookies was far more favorable when there was a change from excess to scarcity than when there was persistent scarcity. Would I make the same decision if I could go back in time knowing what I know now?
We will experience pressure from both personal and interpersonal sources to act in accordance with our decision or stance after we have made it. We will react under those influences in a way that supports our initial choice.
We also have pre-programmed cassettes, and while these typically work in our favor, their trigger characteristics can be utilized to trick us into playing them at the incorrect moments. This is a crucial concept to grasp.
Social scientists have found that when we believe we have made the decision to act in a particular way without experiencing significant outside pressure, we assume inner responsibility for that action.
The law states that we must make an effort to provide what someone has given us in kind in return.
According to the social proof principle, a notion is more likely to be true if a larger number of people agree with it.
When our ability to possess something is constrained, it becomes less readily available and our desire for it increases. We hardly ever realize that a psychological reaction has increased our desire for something; all we know is that we want it. Nevertheless, in order to legitimize our desire for the object, we start by attributing it favorable features.
Evidently, we respond to praises with such instinctive positivity that we are susceptible to those who exploit them to gain our favor.
Our natural response to lack impairs our ability to reason.
We favor those who are like us. This observation seems to be true regardless of whether the similarities are related to beliefs, character qualities, backgrounds, or way of life.
In addition to losing the benefit of the contrast principle, failing to do so will make the principle actively work against salesmen, making it far less profitable for them to present the costlier item first. An expensive product will appear even more expensive as a result of being presented after an inexpensive one, which is hardly a desirable outcome for most sales companies.
Without a doubt, when people are unsure of themselves, they are more prone to base their decisions on the behavior of others.
Even when social evidence has been blatantly fabricated, individuals who employ it have been successful in manipulating audiences.
It is simple to give in to the convenience of automatic obedience once we discover that obeying authorities is typically rewarding.
The sense of having to compete for limited resources has strong motivating qualities.
As a general rule, we should be especially cautious of the circumstances that caused the dust—anytime the dust settles and losers appear to be speaking and acting like winners (and vice versa).
We all deceive ourselves occasionally to maintain our ideas and beliefs in line with what we have already chosen or done.
Thank you for your time.
1 thought on “1-Page free summary: Influence: the psychology of persuasion. (2023)”